What Georgia stands to lose to sequester
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
#1
Randy Vining
on
02/26/13 at 07:35 AM
That's all bull! Nothing will be cut. This is not a cut. It is a removal of future growth. What they really mean is these will not grow as much as they had hoped. Besides Obama and his committee came up with these cuts. They could have come up with others but they wanted these thinking the republicans would not let this happen because the have always defended military spending and law enforcement spending. It is backfiring in Obama's face. It's his deal HE needs to fix it.
#2
Robert Heiney
on
02/26/13 at 06:13 PM
This is another example of why America needs to pare back the bloated out-of-control federal government. These bloatacrats care only about enriching themselves at the expense of the citizens who pay for their largesse. You don't see the bloatacrats reducing their salaries, benefits, and whopping expense accounts. Instead, they concentrate on perpetuating gun safety myths and the "War on Terror". Georgians send all this money up to Washington DC so the bloatacrats can send a portion back attached to federal puppet strings. How much better off would GA be if the money just stayed in GA and the federal government would go off and meddle someplace else? Then we could simply forget this silly sequester issue or peg it for what it truly is: another con job from bloatacrats.
Only registered users may comment on stories. Please login or register to post comments. Your browser must support cookies.
The author does not allow comments to this entry























