Written by Robert Heiney
-----------------------------
While watching the 3 ring circus known as President Obama's first state of the union address, I couldn't help but wonder what they were smoking. From the fake grins plastered on the faces of Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi to the endless standing ovations over every other sentence uttered by the President – it was a surreal event. But we should focus on one main point – this is not about President Obama. While he was the Messenger-In-Chief, your attention should be directed at those standing in front and behind him. Mr. Obama is really just a figurehead for the organized crime syndicate in control of Washington DC.
Comments
Wed, Jul 18, 2018 - 03:00 PM
The appropriate action was taken. No one is perfect!
Wed, Jul 18, 2018 - 10:43 AM
One other thought on the cemetery situation. It looks really nice now that the fami [...]
Wed, Jul 18, 2018 - 10:37 AM
What do other places do when this happens? What is the liability to the Chamber if [...]
Recent Stories
- Charlie Rogers
- Friday, July 20 2018
- Ronnie Barkley
- Friday, July 20 2018
- Christopher Penn
- Friday, July 20 2018
- Trojans working hard as football draws near
- Wednesday, July 18 2018
- Watching 'Sharp Objects' a surreal experience
- Wednesday, July 18 2018
Our so called leaders have turned the running of this nation into a sports game and we the people love to watch it and suck it up. We have chosen our teams and we route for them and them only. Our leaders have stopped thinking of the people and only want to make a name for them selves. The opposing team will not let the other make a change even if they know it was the right one because that would hurt their own team. This country will continue to go down hill until we stop looking at politics as a game and help the american people.
He just doesn't have the balls, but then again not many Presidents have had any of those. Just more of the same ol same ol from Washington.
Are you now, with your infinite intelligence, the deciding factor on how our countries problems should be solved and how long it should take to solve them? It is the judgment of people like you that voted Bush into office. I think, after 8 years of conservative rule, you should give it a rest. Let our president work it out in the manner in which he believes is best for our country. He has more information on this matter than you. Suggestions and criticism are easy to make when you are not accountable to anyone.
The teabaggers are about 8 years too late.
I disagree with you on two points, the first is "And sending more troops to Afghanistan on American adventures in futility and vanity." Come on Bob, those are the folks that attacked us on 9/11. I have no problem in kicking out a government as brutal and backward as they were/are if we don't win. Is the current government perfect, no but they are certainly better and hopefully will continue to improve. I don't think you are advocating returning Afgan females be returned to chattel status. Please explain what is the "vanity" in this situation.
My second area of disagreement is about the "orwellan" Patriot Act. Please give us concrete examples of how this law has run amuck. I haven't heard of a single one, what I have heard is alot of blather about what it might do. I have no problem with someone listening to a phone call made to me from say Yemen or Afganistan and certain words are spoken, i.e. bomb or other somewhat harmless words. Please remember we are a nation at war and certain folks what to kill us. If you have forgotten 9/11 then remember the Christmas Day bomber that our government bungled so badly.
Learn more about Commie Obama here: commieblaster(dot)com
Exactly!
Something to start with:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704022804575042112185849380.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_opinion
It's from the Wall Street Journal (Not Fox News) Because you folks don't understand Fox News.
I don't know where we would be but, we likely wouldn't be 10 Trillion in the red. Government likely wouldn't have stolen from General Motors stock holders and handed it over to the union. GM would likely have still been bailed out but it wouldn't be strong-armed by government takeover. There likely wouldn't have been any behind door bribes for votes. We likely would have had a leader that spent more time telling the truth than running away from it. We likely would have had a leader that could speak to school children without the aid of a teleprompter. We likely would have had a leader that could speak to the people and maintain eye contact rather than glancing left and right into a teleprompter. We likely would have had a leader that could make a military troop decision in days rather than months. We likely wouldn't have a leader blaming all his problems on the last administration while secretly adopting the last administration’s policies. We likely wouldn't have a leader that bows to other national leaders. We likely wouldn’t have a leader that travels the world apologizing for his country. We likely wouldn't be the punch line of a joke by other world leaders and their people. We likely would still have respect from countries like North Korea, Russia, Iran, and China. We likely wouldn't have a leader suspect on turning his back on Israel.
I'm sorry. The list goes on and on, and this is just off the top of my head as I have seen. Imagine if I had actually performed any research. Do you need more?
You mean that even after 'science' has finally come out and admitted that they have stretched the truth on global warming, that you still believe in it? Look it up. They have cooked the books in order to create this mass hysteria that the planet is a ticking time bomb. But you still believe in it?
Hey pal, I got some swamp land in Arizona I'd love to sell ya...
If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the FY 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for those budgets. If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.
And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete FY 2009.
All aboard the obama train
you can ride if you have no brain
of coarse obama is just the name
he'll be on the tax paid plane.
Happy con trails to you until we meet again. I wonder how he got a passport with no birth certificate. Maybe he borrowed one from his illegal immigrant Aunt Free Ride.
The federal government used 9/11 as an excuse to ram through the 342 page bill that most of Congress and the Senate probably never read in its entirety. The bill which starts off with, “To deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes.”, gives the federal government extraordinary power to wiretap, bug homes, offices, and other places without too much oversight, detain individuals without specifically charging them, illegal searches - Kent, it goes on and on.
Freedom and liberty are being incrementally taken away from the citizens of the US. Any and every crisis is used to justify yet another series of unconstitutional bills to be placed before a willing Puppet-In-Chief like Bush and Obama for obligatory signing into law.
And what effect does this have on terrorism? Just ask the passengers on Flight 253 who almost lost their lives because of the massive failures of the 20 or more security agencies taxpayers fund to the tune of billions of dollars.
The truth is: The Patriot Act is great for keeping a law abiding citizenry under control. That’s its real purpose. Remember the MIACs Report. Terrorists were described as, 2nd Amendment Gun Rights activists, Pro-Lifers, Ron Paul supporters, ad nauseam. Kent - I’d rather take my chances against al-Queda than the US federal government. Because they are the real terrorist threat to the people of the US.
Must be because real scientists just say no to man-made global climate change.
Global warming is a scheme to rob people like you and me of more money out of our pockets.
And another question…would you sit in your car as it is running while in the garage with no outside doors open. Do you think it is safe? Do you keep your garbage inside when the trash bag is full so it stinks up the house or do you take it outside to be properly disposed of?
You dont have to believe in global warming but if you take a look in your home, you will realize the obvious. You should keep the area in which you live clean. Think about the earth as a large home, with 6 billion people in it. And you still think we do not have an effect on the atmosphere? Delusional...
scroll down to the section on "Stretching Deficit Facts?"
http://www.petitionproject.org/
31,000+ scientists signed a petition to reject the Kyoto agreement. Go find out why.
Second: one volcano can pump out 6000 tons per day of particulates - that's just one volcano. Sun spots and variations in earth and moon orbits affect the climate far more than man-made climate change.
You're right about one thing - there's nothing gained by humans who are a bunch of filthy polluting slobs.
But - there's no justification for One World Government types to use climate change as an excuse to draw huge new taxes out of everyone and to lay big new regulatory burdens on the world population.
And that's the real truth behind the global warming scam.